On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Ross J. Reedstrom <reedstrm@rice.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 09:41:37PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:15 PM, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com> wrote:
>> > If we don't need a PoC module for each new hooks, I'm not strongly
>> > motivated to push it into contrib tree.
>> > How about your opinion?
>>
>> I'd say let it go, unless someone else feels strongly about it.
>
> I would use this module (rate limit new connection attempts) as soon as
> I could. Putting a cap on potential CPU usage on a production DB by either
> a blackhat or mistake by a developer caused by a mistake in
> configuration (leaving the port accessible) is definitely useful, even
> in the face of max_connections. My production apps already have
> their connections and seldom need new ones. They all use CPU though.
If KaiGai updates the code per previous discussion, would you be
willing to take a crack at adding documentation?
P.S. Your email client seems to be setting the Reply-To address to a
ridiculous value.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
