Re: Pushing IN (subquery) down through UNION ALL? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Pushing IN (subquery) down through UNION ALL?
Date
Msg-id AANLkTinM1gAqY2r5An+qG77bJkJu6H6GaRHRZ316d1sS@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Pushing IN (subquery) down through UNION ALL?  (Dave Johansen <davejohansen@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Pushing IN (subquery) down through UNION ALL?  (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Dave Johansen <davejohansen@gmail.com> wrote:
> I also just noticed that an ORDER BY x LIMIT n optimization is not pushed
> down through the UNION ALL as well. I understand that this may be a little
> trickier because the ORDER BY and LIMIT would need to be applied to the
> subqueries and then re-applied after the APPEND,

PostgreSQL 9.1 will know how to do this, FWIW.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Andy Colson
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance trouble finding records through related records
Next
From: Thom Brown
Date:
Subject: Re: Pushing IN (subquery) down through UNION ALL?