Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jaime Casanova
Subject Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array
Date
Msg-id AANLkTinHcLBOnAHZ8iSSv13+twWbje5Z6WYCF=rLRW23@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array  (Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> this patch implement a new iteration construct - iteration over an
>> array. The sense of this new iteration is:
>>  * a simple and cleaner syntax
>
> i will start the review of this one...

so, what is the concensus for this patch?
return with feedback? reject the patch on the grounds that we should
go fix unnest() if it slow?
something else?

the patch itself works as advertised (in functionality) but i haven't
make much performance tests to see if we actually win something

--
Jaime Casanova         www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Tab completion for view triggers in psql
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Proposed Windows-specific change: Enable crash dumps (like core files)