Re: Multithreaded query onto 4 postgresql instances - Mailing list pgsql-general

From pasman pasmański
Subject Re: Multithreaded query onto 4 postgresql instances
Date
Msg-id AANLkTinFJ6zeYvAS3Zt2w=xa6FKwBMkUd8uaH+Mcr3ng@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Multithreaded query onto 4 postgresql instances  (Alessandro Candini <candini@meeo.it>)
Responses Re: Multithreaded query onto 4 postgresql instances
List pgsql-general
I think this is bad idea. Better you use cursors.

2011/2/10, Alessandro Candini <candini@meeo.it>:
> Here you are my probably uncommon situation.
>
> I have installed 4 different instances of postgresql-9.0.2 on the same
> machine, on ports 5433, 5434, 5435, 5436.
> On these instances I have splitted a huge database, dividing it per date
> (from 1995 to 1998 on 5433, from 1999 to 2002 on 5434 and so on...).
> Then I have developed a C function using libpq which creates 4 threads,
> each one which query a 1/4 of the db. After that I merge the results in
> one single response.
>
> My function works fine, but I need to include it inside a postgresql
> instance in order to launch it as a normal SQL query (SELECT myfunc(...);).
> Why I have to do something tricky like this is long too explain...
>
> I have read the documentation here
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/xfunc-sql.html#XFUNC-SQL-FUNCTIONS-RETURNING-SET,
> but I'm pretty confuse and I don't know if this is the right way to
> accomplish my goal.
>
> Have you got any ideas or suggestions?
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> --
> Alessandro Candini
>
> MEEO S.r.l.
> Via Saragat 9
> I-44122 Ferrara, Italy
> Tel: +39 0532 1861501
> Fax: +39 0532 1861637
> http://www.meeo.it
>
> ========================================
> "ATTENZIONE:le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio sono
> da considerarsi confidenziali ed il loro utilizzo è riservato unicamente
> al destinatario sopra indicato. Chi dovesse ricevere questo messaggio
> per errore è tenuto ad informare il mittente ed a rimuoverlo
> definitivamente da ogni supporto elettronico o cartaceo."
>
> "WARNING:This message contains confidential and/or proprietary
> information which may be subject to privilege or immunity and which
> is intended for use of its addressee only. Should you receive this
> message in error, you are kindly requested to inform the sender and
> to definitively remove it from any paper or electronic format."
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>


--
------------
pasman

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Glenn Maynard
Date:
Subject: Re: Schema version control
Next
From: "Burcher, Greg"
Date:
Subject: More log detail on deadlock detection