Re: Is there a logical reason for 25P02? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Konstantin Izmailov
Subject Re: Is there a logical reason for 25P02?
Date
Msg-id AANLkTinDWYnuMRmj_Oosr4muD8umoQwNRtN=8iMe_6u2@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is there a logical reason for 25P02?  (Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>)
List pgsql-general
Craig,
I think that failure of a previous command is the most possible reason. It is an unexpected discovery since I keep track of statements that were already prepared on the connection (to avoid preparing a statement twice). However, the code might be flowed somehow. Anyway, I decided to use PQexec for the time being.

Cédric, I'm basically using a code similar to one in pgloader. I'm trying to find a way to efficiently handle an integrity violation error when inserting large amount of data. Graceful handling means that a transaction should not be aborted when the code tries to insert a duplicate row. Is using of a SAVEPOINT only solution?

Thank you
Konstantin


On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 4:13 AM, Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au> wrote:
On 10/05/2010 12:39 PM, Konstantin Izmailov wrote:
Howdy,
I've noticed that there is a difference in result of execution of the
following statement:
  INSERT INTO testtable(col1) VALUES(NULL);
depending on whether the command is prepared or not.

If I call PQprepare/PQexecPrepared for the statement, the error
"transaction aborted" is returned with SQL State = "25P02".

Specifically, I suspect the message should be:

ERROR:  current transaction is aborted, commands ignored until end of transaction block

If that's what you're getting, the problem was with an earlier command that returned an error you didn't notice, not with the command you just ran. I'm unsure if this could cause PQexecPrepared to return sqlstate 25P02 if PQprepare fails, but would want to investigate the possibility.

--
Craig Ringer

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Basic SQL question and kudos
Next
From: Dennis Gearon
Date:
Subject: Re: Basic SQL question and kudos