Re: Sync Rep v19 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: Sync Rep v19
Date
Msg-id AANLkTinDU=fHfN6mcw=8Q2KCeb9_Z1rhsku4F93fbjVk@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Sync Rep v19  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Sync Rep v19
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
>>> Anyway, this is code in the interrupt handler and only gets executed
>>> when we receive SIGTERM for a fast shutdown.
>>
>> I trust it's not getting *directly* executed from the interrupt handler,
>> at least not without ImmediateInterruptOK.
>
> Yes, the backend waits for replication while cancel/die interrupt is
> being blocked, i.e., InterruptHoldoffCount > 0. So SIGTERM doesn't
> lead the waiting backend to there directly. The backend reaches there
> after returning the result.

BTW, this is true in COMMIT and PREPARE cases, and false in
COMMIT PREPARED and ROLLBACK PREPARED cases. In the
latter cases, HOLD_INTERRUPT() is not called before waiting for
replication.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Sync Rep v19
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Sync Rep v19