Re: Londiste - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Londiste
Date
Msg-id AANLkTin91FWxhp2gjH1T0WzPQCO8Dx5qe6k8h73o4Uk3@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Londiste  (alvherre <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-docs
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 4:03 PM, alvherre <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié may 26 15:56:45 -0400 2010:
>
>> > That is an excellent idea, not only for replication, but there are
>> > probably other wiki pages that we should link to from our main docs.  I
>> > will go through the wiki, find appropriate pages, and add links from our
>> > docs.
>>
>> I don't know that I'm eager to link from our docs to the wiki.  That
>> seems likely to lead to maintenance headaches.  But on the other hand,
>> I see no problem mentioning third-party products that are part of the
>> PG ecosystem.
>
> I don't think we should be adding hundreds of wiki links to the docs,
> but if it's just half a dozen, I think it's a good idea.  Those pages
> have already undergone a lot of revision and they are unlikely to go
> away.  We already have links to pages in external sites and they do
> cause some pain, but it's not much and this is only every two years or so.
>
> Keep in mind that pages in the Wiki are going to be replaced by a
> redirect page if they ever get renamed, for example.  It's highly
> unlikely that they are going to disappear completely.

Eh, maybe.  I think generally the wiki documentation is of lower
quality than our main docs.  I'd rather see us put the effort into
writing something that can be incorporated into the docs.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: documentation build log is busted, and has been for awhile
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Londiste