On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> > Francisco Reyes wrote:
>> >> Bruce Momjian writes:
>> >>
>> >> > Well, I assumed "Londiste" head reached the level that we should mention
>> >> > it, but you are right on the floodgates issue. ?We do aleady mention
>> >> > many other replication solutions in other sections, so I didn't think
>> >>
>> >> Then perhaps all that is needed is to just link to the replication section
>> >> of the wiki:
>> >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Replication,_Clustering,_and_Connection_Pool
>> >> ing
>> >>
>> >> A search for replication on the top of the doc page (ie
>> >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/index.html) takes to the high
>> >> availability page, so a reference there to the wiki page may be a good idea.
>> >
>> > That is an excellent idea, not only for replication, but there are
>> > probably other wiki pages that we should link to from our main docs. ?I
>> > will go through the wiki, find appropriate pages, and add links from our
>> > docs.
>>
>> I don't know that I'm eager to link from our docs to the wiki. That
>> seems likely to lead to maintenance headaches. But on the other hand,
>> I see no problem mentioning third-party products that are part of the
>> PG ecosystem.
>
> Well, the problem is that we have more solutions that fit in the docs in
> normal places.
Isn't that just a matter of rejiggering the page formatting a little bit?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
