Re: More then 1600 columns? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Dmitriy Igrishin
Subject Re: More then 1600 columns?
Date
Msg-id AANLkTin84spk-3d_ZVgdWZAcvdMubHek2UXij-hdiusg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: More then 1600 columns?  (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>)
Responses Re: More then 1600 columns?  (Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@xs4all.nl>)
List pgsql-general
Hey Mark,

Yeah, I can't imagine an entity in a real project even with more than 100
columns. Its rare case.
But if you entities (rows/tuples) of some class (table) can contains variable
set of columns (properties) you can look at hstore contrib module.

2010/11/12 John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>
On 11/11/10 9:24 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
"Mark Mitchell"<mmitchell@riccagroup.com>  writes:
Is there are hard limit of 1600 that you cannot get around?
Yes.

Generally, wanting more than a few dozen columns is a good sign that you
need to rethink your schema design.  What are you trying to accomplish
exactly?
       

indeed.    I'd say a good read on 'data normalization' and the Third Normal Form would be in order.

relational databases are *not* spreadsheets (and, for that matter, spreadsheets make lousy relational databases)

if these 1600+ elements come from an ORM, you probably need to rethink your object model, as no sane object class should have that many members.




--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



--
// Dmitriy.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: John R Pierce
Date:
Subject: Re: More then 1600 columns?
Next
From: Peter Bex
Date:
Subject: Re: More then 1600 columns?