Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions
Date
Msg-id AANLkTin51OW-=ntjiajOw_T_y6azX9J1WOsVU3KDoLmV@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions
Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> I understand, but with only text accepting, then CONCAT will has much
> less benefit - you can't do a numeric list, for example
>
> see concat(c1::text, ',', c2::text, ',' ...)
>
> with this is much simpler use a pipes '' || c1 || ',' || c2 ... and
> this operator does necessary cast self.
>
> This function is probably one use case of exception from our rules.

At least two, right?  Because for that use case you'd probably want
concat_ws().  In fact, it's hard for me to think of a variadic text
function where you wouldn't want the "no casts" behavior you're
getting via ANY.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions