Re: sepgsql contrib module - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: sepgsql contrib module
Date
Msg-id AANLkTin3wQ3QBqEunLE+Cjw9VvbOt1S_EOzm-ut_PoPg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: sepgsql contrib module  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: sepgsql contrib module  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: sepgsql contrib module  (Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> For that matter, I wonder what happens with regular function
>> permissions.  If the plan inlines the function and then somebody goes
>> and changes the permission on the function and makes it SECURITY
>> DEFINER, what happens?
>
> ALTER FUNCTION is supposed to cause plan invalidation in such a case.
> Not sure if GRANT plays nice with that though.

And in the case of SE-Linux, this could get changed from outside the
database.  Not sure how to handle that.  I guess we could just never
inline anything, but that might be an overreaction.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: review: FDW API
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup for streaming base backups