Re: psycopg2 (async) socket timeout - Mailing list psycopg

From Daniele Varrazzo
Subject Re: psycopg2 (async) socket timeout
Date
Msg-id AANLkTin3inFX=0wXSwEo9xEUnc8sRM_xBX=7T1iW81yR@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to psycopg2 (async) socket timeout  (Danny Milosavljevic <danny.milo@gmail.com>)
List psycopg
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Danny Milosavljevic
<danny.milo@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is it possible to specify the timeout for the socket underlying a connection?

You can send a command SET statement_timeout to affect all the
commands further sent to the connection

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/runtime-config-client.html#GUC-STATEMENT-TIMEOUT


> Alternatively, since I'm using the async interface anyway, is it
> possible proactively cancel a query that is "stuck" since the TCP
> connection to the database is down?

Jan has contributed a connection.cancel() method, available since psycopg 2.3

http://initd.org/psycopg/docs/connection.html#connection.cancel


> So the specific case is:
> - connect to the postgres database using psycopg2 while network is up
> - run some queries, get the results fine etc
> - send a query
> - the network goes down before the result to this last query has been received
> - neither a result nor an error callback gets called - as far as I can
> see (using txpostgres.ConnectionPool)
>
> What's the proper way to deal with that?

Probably canceling the query from the client: if the network is down
you wouldn't get the signal that the backend timed out. But I've never
dealt with this scenario myself so I guess you should test if any of
the above works for you :)

-- Daniele

psycopg by date:

Previous
From: Danny Milosavljevic
Date:
Subject: psycopg2 (async) socket timeout
Next
From: Federico Di Gregorio
Date:
Subject: RELEASE: 2.4 beta 1