Re: Moving test_fsync to /contrib? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Moving test_fsync to /contrib?
Date
Msg-id AANLkTin0oADtMtN=jN4eXb=K8Ef=1LtBeDdzE3T+9n7w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Moving test_fsync to /contrib?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Moving test_fsync to /contrib?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: Moving test_fsync to /contrib?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>>> It seems like /contrib would be more natural, no?  /bin seems like
>>> overkill because most people will not want to run it.  Most of /contrib
>>> is installed already by installers, I think.
>
>> At least on Red Hat, it is packaged separately.
>
> On Red Hat, it is not packaged at all (at least not by me), and won't
> be unless it goes into contrib.  I don't believe it belongs in the
> base package.

I confess to some confusion about what things "belong" where.  Is
contrib the right place for this because we think it's half-baked, or
because we think most people won't use it, or just because we're
violently allergic to adding stuff to src/bin, or what?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Moving test_fsync to /contrib?
Next
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup for streaming base backups