Re: Moving test_fsync to /contrib? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Moving test_fsync to /contrib?
Date
Msg-id 14131.1295286514@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Moving test_fsync to /contrib?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Moving test_fsync to /contrib?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> On Red Hat, it is not packaged at all (at least not by me), and won't
>> be unless it goes into contrib. I don't believe it belongs in the
>> base package.

> I confess to some confusion about what things "belong" where.  Is
> contrib the right place for this because we think it's half-baked, or
> because we think most people won't use it, or just because we're
> violently allergic to adding stuff to src/bin, or what?

The first two, if you ask me.  And there's another point: I disagree
with the assumption that platform-specific packagings will or should
include test_fsync by default.  It'd be better for the packager to make
a platform-specific choice of default for the users.  I don't mind too
much putting it into a secondary subpackage such as postgresql-contrib,
but you won't be seeing it in postgresql-server.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Moving test_fsync to /contrib?
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: READ ONLY fixes