Re: Bug in pg_describe_object, patch v2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joel Jacobson
Subject Re: Bug in pg_describe_object, patch v2
Date
Msg-id AANLkTimzFFxFdydY4T4=1e4FfOtLET=4bYHpqDpe-D5a@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug in pg_describe_object, patch v2  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
2011/1/15 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> But I can read the handwriting on the wall: if I want this done right,
> I'm going to have to do it myself.
>
>                        regards, tom lane

Excellently put! I will with pride steal that phrase and use it
whenever I run into the same situation myself.
Quite often a proposed "good enough solution" introduces unnecessary
complexity and awkwardness, while at the same time the "proper
solution" requires an unproportionally amount of resources to
accomplish.
The model most people adapt is a mix of both. Spend time on details
when it is absolutely necessary and accept "good enough solutions"
until someone (not necessarily yourself, like you suggested) gets
motivated enough to implement the "proper solution".

I don't think and I hope it's not just one guy in the universe who can
get it "done right".

So, instead of fighting like war maniacs on this
god-damn-two-lines-of-code-patch, could Tom please describe to the
patch submitter what you mean with get it "done right", and perhaps
the patch submitter will be motivated enough to invest a few
hundred/thousands hours of his time to solve the problem the way
hinted by Tom?

--
Best regards,

Joel Jacobson
Glue Finance

E: jj@gluefinance.com
T: +46 70 360 38 01

Postal address:
Glue Finance AB
Box  549
114 11  Stockholm
Sweden

Visiting address:
Glue Finance AB
Birger Jarlsgatan 14
114 34 Stockholm
Sweden


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert default wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux 2.6.33+
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: textarray option for file FDW