Re: Simplifying replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Simplifying replication
Date
Msg-id AANLkTimx2g2s6gZ5bKo2+pjRdmEy5oh5z-Pnahj0=X0S@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Simplifying replication  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Greg,
>>
>> > The way things stand you *always* need archived logs. Even if you have
>> > streaming set up it might try to use archived logs if it falls too far
>> > behind.
>>
>> Actually, you don't.  If you're willing to accept possible
>> desynchronization and recloning of the standbys, then you can skip the
>> archive logs.
>
> Agreed, but as a reality check:  when I proposed that wal_keep_segments
> = -1 would keep all WAL segments (for use while the file system was
> being backed up), I was told administrators shoud compute how much free
> disk space they had.  Obviously easy of use is not our #1 priority.

Amen.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: max_wal_senders must die
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: psql autocompletion for \z and \dg