Re: Review: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: Review: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle
Date
Msg-id AANLkTimvxr1SaR-N6x_Q2gouLp=OttjYdctxn5MUDc-Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Review: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle
List pgsql-hackers
This patch suffered a lot of bitrot in the last month, mostly due to the noop patch for SSI.  It also used the term SERIALIZABLE in many places to indicate any transaction-snapshot mode transaction, so I applied changes consistent with the noop patch.  I also found a few whitespace and brace usage issues which seemed to conflict with conventional usage and cleaned those up.  A minor spelling typo also corrected.
 
A new patch reflecting all this is attached.
 
This now compiles and passes regression tests.  I still need to re-run all the other tests which Florian and I previously used to test the patch.  I don't have any reason to expect that they will now fail, but one need to be thorough.  Once that is confirmed, I think this will be ready for committer unless someone can think of something else to throw at it first.
 
-Kevin

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: INSERT and parentheses
Next
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: Serializable Snapshot Isolation