Re: LOCK for non-tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: LOCK for non-tables
Date
Msg-id AANLkTimrSzjOqs9d+gu_34LVhmRUQaMh3zNPexcxNnBe@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: LOCK for non-tables  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: LOCK for non-tables  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> I suggest also marking each item with a release in which we intend to do
>>> it, so we don't have to try to remember whether a reasonable amount of
>>> time has elapsed.
>
>> You mean like the way the 9.1devel documentation says that
>> contrib/xml2 will be removed in 8.4?  I wonder if we'll do anything
>> either about deprecating the module or about changing the
>> documentation before 8.4 is EOL.
>
> Well, that one is a special case, because we knew perfectly well that we
> hadn't replaced all the functionality of xml2 (and we still haven't).
> I think the "official" deprecation list should only contain items for
> which there's no blocking issue other than wanting to give users time to
> migrate to an existing alternate solution.

Fair enough.

Do we wish to officially document LOCK without TABLE as a good idea to
start avoiding, in case we decide to do something about that in the
future?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup for streaming base backups
Next
From: Marko Tiikkaja
Date:
Subject: Re: Transaction-scope advisory locks