Re: ALTER OBJECT any_name SET SCHEMA name - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: ALTER OBJECT any_name SET SCHEMA name
Date
Msg-id AANLkTimkuTX9pgoKFm75_XxG4xO51qz=LTJOQgXZxb50@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ALTER OBJECT any_name SET SCHEMA name  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
Responses Re: ALTER OBJECT any_name SET SCHEMA name
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
<dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> Just do "SET search_path=@extschema@" at the beginning of the install
>> script, just like we have "SET search_path=public" there now.
>
> Well there's the installation itself then the "runtime", as you say
> later...
>
>> Well, in case of functions you can always do "CREATE FUNCTION ... AS $$
>> ... $$ SET search_path=@extschema".
>
> Fair enough.
>
>> "ALTER ... SET SCHEMA" wouldn't do anything for SQL statements embedded in
>> plperl or plpython anyway.
>
> That's why I was thinking about adding the possibility to:
>  - easily find your function's etc OID, that's already mainly done
>  - be able to call/use those objects per OID
>
> Ok that sucks somehow.

Yeah, I think that sucks a lot.  I don't see what's wrong with
Heikki's solution, actually.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: type info refactoring
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: type info refactoring