Re: SSI bug? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: SSI bug?
Date
Msg-id AANLkTimgy7xgS0zdC0LiU=5zgsSGwKGTaPppeza7WAQb@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SSI bug?  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Responses Re: SSI bug?
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:
>
>> I'm still looking at whether it's sane to try to issue a warning
>> when an HTAB exceeds the number of entries declared as its
>> max_size when it was created.
>
> I think this does it.
>
> If nothing else, it might be instructive to use it while testing the
> SSI patch.  Would it make any sense to slip this into 9.1, or should
> I add it to the first 9.2 CF?

I don't think it's too late to commit something like this, but I'm not
clear on whether we want it.  Is this checking for what should be a
can't-happen case, or are these soft limits that we expect to be
exceeded from time to time?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vaibhav Kaushal
Date:
Subject: Re: When and how many times does ExecSetParamPlan executes?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: SSI bug?