On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> On 6/17/10 1:40 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>>>> Since there are no other votes for that option (or, indeed, any other
>>>> option), I'm going to go with my original instinct and change hstore
>>>> => text[] to hstore & text[]. Patch to do that is attached.
>>> If what that operator is doing is appending an array of text to an
>>> Hstore, shouldn't we use || instead?
>>
>> It isn't. || already does what you're saying.
>
> So what *does* it do?
>
> OK, so after a brief poll on IRC, one reason you're not getting coherent
> feedback on this is that few people understand the operators which
> hstore 9.0 already uses and which are new for 9.0, let alone what new
> operators are proposed for each thing. I know I've completely lost
> track, particularly since doc patches haven't kept up with the code
> changes. I've reread most of this thread and it doesn't help me.
>
> On the other hand, maybe less feedback is less bikeshedding. You decide.
Well, they are documented, so you can read up on them...
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/hstore.html
This isn't a critical issue in desperate need of community input; we
just need to resolve it one way or the other so we can move on to the
next thing. I'm still inclined to go ahead and apply the patch I
attached upthread, because that is less work for me than doing
anything else...
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
