Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
Date
Msg-id AANLkTim_uPP2AGj3M_Ki0Ubu_NEe14A0RWg7zfivO=qX@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump  (Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> Why not just say give me the snapshot currently held by process nnnn?
>
> And please, not temp files if possible.

As far as I'm aware, the full snapshot doesn't normally exist in
shared memory, hence the need for publication of some sort.  We could
dedicate a shared memory region for publication but then you have to
decide how many slots to allocate, and any number you pick will be too
many for some people and not enough for others, not to mention that
shared memory is a fairly precious resource.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_execute_from_file review
Next
From: Rob Wultsch
Date:
Subject: Re: profiling connection overhead