Re: pg_dump custom format across versions - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Thom Brown
Subject Re: pg_dump custom format across versions
Date
Msg-id AANLkTimZPQ6aDmfXLbjYD0KeOlhdhRuapkKzkHZ6na3X@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump custom format across versions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On 12 May 2010 20:18, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Thom Brown <thombrown@gmail.com> writes:
> On 12 May 2010 19:40, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>>> Am I to gather that there are possible incompatibilities?
>>
>> Definitely.

> In that case, it might be an idea to clarify that on the documentation.  I
> couldn't find this information.

If it were true, it would be in the documentation.

The reason for suggesting that you use the newer pg_dump during a
version upgrade is that the newer version might have bug fixes that
your current version lacks.  In the absence of bugs, however, pg_restore
is supposed to read dump files produced by older versions of pg_dump.
If it fails to, that in itself is a filable bug.

                       regards, tom lane

Ah, I see.  Thanks.  Well I think that information would still be useful in the docs.  

Thom

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Richard Broersma
Date:
Subject: Re: Auditing usage
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: SQLite (was: RE: Reliability of Windows versions 8.3or 8.4)