On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> On 12/06/2010 10:22 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
>> <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 06.12.2010 15:53, Robert Haas wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I guess. It still seems far too much like exposing the server's guts
>>>> for my taste. It might not be as bad as the expression tree stuff,
>>>> but there's nothing particularly good about it either.
>>>
>>> Note that we already have txid_current_snapshot() function, which exposes
>>> all that.
>>
>> Fair enough, and I think that's actually useful for Slony&c. But I
>> don't think we should shy away of providing a cleaner API here.
>>
>
> Just don't let the perfect get in the way of the good :P
I'll keep that in mind. :-)
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
