On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 03:40, Radosław Smogura
<rsmogura@softperience.eu> wrote:
>> Regarding JDBC in the CF process -- other interfaces are handled
>> there. I haven't seen one patch this size for JDBC since I've been
>> involved, let alone two competing patches to implement the same
>> feature. Small patches which can be quickly handled don't make sense
>> to put into the process, but it seemed reasonable for these.
>
> In any way I'm sending this patch, and I will put this under Miscellaneous in
> CF. This cleared patch takes only 47k (in uncleared was some binary read
> classes) and about 50% it's big test case.
I changed the patch's topic to "JDBC".
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=399
Patch reviewers are still wanted.
--
Itagaki Takahiro
