On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> The extensions patch currently records that an object is part of an
> extension by making a pg_depend entry with deptype 'i' (INTERNAL).
> While that has the behavior we want, I wonder whether it wouldn't
> be smarter in the long run to invent a new deptype for this purpose.
+1.
> If we go with a new deptype, I was thinking of using 'm' (macro
> DEPENDENCY_MEMBER) but am not set on that. Have we been using any
> particular term to refer to the objects that belong to an extension?
DEPENDENCY_EXTENSION?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
