On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 5:04 AM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Daniel Farina wrote:
>>
>> As it will be somewhat hard to prove the durability guarantees of
>> commit without special heroics, unless someone can suggest a
>> mechanism.
>
> Could you introduce a hack creating deterministic server side crashes in
> order to test this out? The simplest thing that comes to mind is a rule
> like "kick shared memory in the teeth to force a crash after every 100
> commits", then see if #100 shows up as expected. Pick two different small
> numbers for the interval and you could probably put that on both sides to
> simulate all sorts of badness.
I probably could via function, would a kill -9 also be of interest to you?
--
fdr
