Re: Patch for 9.1: initdb -C option - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Patch for 9.1: initdb -C option
Date
Msg-id AANLkTimFy1S4B83-iB1Lf9-u62uHcsjXRK9VW8NDPQFH@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Patch for 9.1: initdb -C option  (KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>)
Responses Re: Patch for 9.1: initdb -C option
List pgsql-hackers
2010/7/23 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>:
> Sorry for the confusion.
>
> What I wanted to say is the patch itself is fine but we need to make consensus
> before the detailed code reviewing.

I guess we probably need some more people to express an opinion, then.
Do you have one?

I'm not sure I do, yet.  I'd like to hear the patch author's response
to Itagaki Takahiro's question upthread: "Why don't you use just "echo
'options' >> $PGDATA/postgresql.conf" ?  Could you explain where the
-C options is better than initdb + echo?"

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Add column if not exists (CINE)
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: security label support, part.2