On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Takahiro Itagaki
<itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>
>> > how about showing actual waiting time instead?
>> > " waiting for max_standby_delay (%d ms)",
>> > MaxStandbyDelay)
>>
>> Sounds interesting, but how often would the ps statust display be
>> updated? I hope not too often.
>
> We can change the interval of updates to 500ms or so if do it,
> but I rethink ps display is not the best place for the information.
>
> I'd like to modify the additonal message "waiting for max_standby_delay"
> just to "waiting", because we don't use "waiting for statement_timeout"
> for normal queries.
+1
I don't think that it's useful to display the value of max_standby_delay.
> If we need additional information about conflictions in recovery,
> we would supply them with SQL views instead of ps display in 9.1.
+1
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
