On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 17:29, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> Since we now show the application name in pg_stat_replication, I think
>> it would make sense to have the walreceiver set
>> fallback_application_name on the connection string, like so:
>
> Seems reasonable, but "postgres" is a mighty poor choice of name
> for that, no? I don't have any really great substitute suggestion
> --- best I can do offhand is "walreceiver" --- but "postgres" seems
> uselessly generic, not to mention potentially confusing compared
> to the default superuser name for instance.
I agree it's not a great name.
Is "walreceiver" something that "the average DBA" is going to realize
what it is? Perhaps go for something like "replication slave"?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
