Re: Bug in pg_describe_object - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joel Jacobson
Subject Re: Bug in pg_describe_object
Date
Msg-id AANLkTim7YPPYvHbTZFMMpAiYHgqdTwguanM36d=uViHv@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug in pg_describe_object  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Bug in pg_describe_object  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
2011/1/11 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>:
> I don't get it.  If two different items that exist in the system out
> of the box have the same description, it seems clear that relevant
> piece of disambiguating information exists nowhere in the description
> string.

I guess it is a question of prioritization.
If backwards compatibility is to be guaranteed, even for functions
returning text intended to be read by humans, then the function cannot
be modified, without violating that golden rule, if such a rule exists
within the PostgreSQL development project?

If it's not a golden rule, then it's a totally different story and
there is no excuse why it should return the same descriptions for the
same objects.
Any other reasoning is just silly.

--
Best regards,

Joel Jacobson
Glue Finance


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER TYPE 0: Introduction; test cases
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER TYPE 0: Introduction; test cases