2010/7/12 Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>:
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=300
>
> Why did you add to_string() and to_array() functions though we already
> have string_to_array() and array_to_string() functions? I prefer adding
> three arguments version of string_to_array() instead of to_array().
> Please notice me if you think to_string() and to_array() are better names
> for the feature. For example, compatibility for other databases.
>
I prefere a new names - because there are a new behave - with little
bit better default handling of NULL values. string_to_array and
array_to_string just ignore NULL values - what isn't correct behave.
Later we can mark these functions as deprecated and remove it. If I
use current function, then we have to continue in current behave.
> * string_to_array( str text, sep text, nullstr text DEFAULT NULL )
> is compatible with the existing string_to_array( str, sep ), and
> "nullstr => 'NULL'" will be same as your to_array().
>
> * array_to_string( arr anyarray, sep text, nullstr text DEFAULT NULL )
> is compatible with the existing array_to_string(); separator also ignored
> when nullstr is NULL. "nullstr => ''" (an empty string) will be same as
> your to_array().
>
so reason for these new names are different default behave. And we
can't to change of default behave of existing functions.
Regards
Pavel Stehule
> --
> Itagaki Takahiro
>
