Re: simple functions, huge overhead, no cache - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: simple functions, huge overhead, no cache
Date
Msg-id AANLkTilNdH69Ck9rQcWkKi2TBezThEhWYr7QobrxnPP-@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: simple functions, huge overhead, no cache  (Josip Rodin <joy@entuzijast.net>)
Responses Re: simple functions, huge overhead, no cache  (Josip Rodin <joy@entuzijast.net>)
List pgsql-general
2010/7/12 Josip Rodin <joy@entuzijast.net>:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 02:06:43PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> Meh, personally I'll stick to the good old profiling methods "is it fast
>> enough", "\timing", and "explain analyze".
>
> I agree. Some hint could be included in 'explain analyze' output, maybe just
> to separate the timings for things that are well covered by the query plan
> optimizer from those that aren't. I found this in a line like this:

it is useles for functions - explain doesn't show lines of executed
functions. Can you show some example of some more complex query.

Pavel


>
> Filter: (approved AND (NOT archived) AND ((time_to > now()) OR (time_to IS NULL)) AND ((time_from < now()) OR
(time_fromIS NULL)) AND usercandoonobject(1, 1, 'news'::bpchar, news_id)) 
>
> These other referenced columns in the filter were all insignificant
> (time-wise) compared to the single function call, but I had to find
> that out with a manual search.
>
> --
>     2. That which causes joy or happiness.
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Josip Rodin
Date:
Subject: Re: simple functions, huge overhead, no cache
Next
From: Tom Wilcox
Date:
Subject: Re: Configure Postgres From SQL