Re: Optimize PL/Perl function argument passing [PATCH] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alex Hunsaker
Subject Re: Optimize PL/Perl function argument passing [PATCH]
Date
Msg-id AANLkTikyS4wC8pAaB5AMNQLe_HkmBjKyAfY9KoZPp4B1@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Optimize PL/Perl function argument passing [PATCH]  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:22, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:

> This looks pretty good. But why are we bothering to keep $prolog at all any
> more, if all we're going to pass it is &PL_sv_no all the time? Maybe we'll
> have a use for it in the future, but right now we don't appear to unless I'm
> missing something.

I don't see any reason to keep it around.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Error code for "terminating connection due to conflict with recovery"
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: SSI patch version 14