Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch
Date
Msg-id AANLkTikqz+P=qnNpAOhighZPhsjz_-iiwzOq6xPwJk1Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
2010/8/7 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
>> On Aug 6, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>> so there is only small step to proposed feature
>>> SELECT foo(this := 'that', "1" := 4)
>
>> Sorry, not following you here

I would to difference a key and value in notation.

>
> Pavel doesn't understand "no" ;-)
>

you are don't writing a stored procedures like me - so maybe you are
doesn't understand a my motivation. :). I have to try it. You are
rejected almost of all my proposals - named parameters, variadic
functions, enhancing of RAISE STATEMENT - and now its in core. But it
was a battle :). Try to write a XML-RPC support for PostgreSQL, and
try to thinking on programmer comfort, please. I am sure so our
support for stored procedures or external procedures are not complete
- it is limited by BISON possibilities, and because BISON isn't
extensible parser, I am searching other ways. If I can enhance a
syntax from external module, I don't talk.

Regards

Pavel




Regards

Pavel

>                        regards, tom lane
>


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: KaiGai Kohei
Date:
Subject: Re: refactoring comment.c
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: GROUPING SETS revisited