Re: pl/python tracebacks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alex Hunsaker
Subject Re: pl/python tracebacks
Date
Msg-id AANLkTikjdPiAfdu6x68u0ahgDybTL9rtzP30mc8O854d@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pl/python tracebacks  (Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org>)
Responses Re: pl/python tracebacks  (Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 02:10, Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org> wrote:
> On 06/02/11 20:12, Jan Urbański wrote:
>> On 27/01/11 22:58, Jan Urbański wrote:
>>> On 23/12/10 14:56, Jan Urbański wrote:
>>>> Here's a patch implementing traceback support for PL/Python mentioned in
>>>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-12/msg01991.php. It's
>>>> an incremental patch on top of the plpython-refactor patch sent eariler.
>>>
>>> Updated to master.
>>
>> Updated to master again.
>
> Once more.

In PLy_traceback fname and prname look like they will leak (well as
much as a palloc() in an error path can leak I suppose).  Other than
that everything looks good. I tested plpython2 and plpython3 and
skimmed the docs to see if there was anything obvious that needed
updating. I also obviously looked at the added regression tests and
made sure they worked.

Marking as Ready.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Itagaki Takahiro
Date:
Subject: Re: multiset patch review
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3