Re: Hot Standby btree delete records and vacuum_defer_cleanup_age - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: Hot Standby btree delete records and vacuum_defer_cleanup_age
Date
Msg-id AANLkTikZSj=ZCm79MxwnzRoKO5_Rh8Wm84EHM8KyQzzo@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hot Standby btree delete records and vacuum_defer_cleanup_age  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Hot Standby btree delete records and vacuum_defer_cleanup_age
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 00:16 +0100, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> On 09.12.2010 00:10, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> > On 08.12.2010 16:00, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> >> Heikki pointed out to me that the btree delete record processing does
>> >> not respect vacuum_defer_cleanup_age. It should.
>> >>
>> >> Attached patch to implement that.
>> >>
>> >> Looking to commit in next few hours barring objections/suggestions, to
>> >> both HEAD and 9_0_STABLE, in time for next minor release.
>> >
>> > Please note that it was Noah Misch that raised this a while ago:
>> >
>> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-11/msg01919.php
>>
>> On closer look, that's not actually the same issue, sorry for the noise..
>
> Heikki, this one *is* important. Will fix. Thanks for the analysis Noah.

Is this an open item for 9.1?

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump -X
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: patch: fix performance problems with repated decomprimation of varlena values in plpgsql