On 17 July 2010 21:30, Joseph Conway <mail@joeconway.com> wrote:
> On 7/17/10 1:26 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
>> On 17 July 2010 21:23, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Thom Brown <thombrown@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> While they're quite attractive, I actually see them being more
>>>> confusing than helpful personally, but I could be wrong. I reckon
>>>> there might be clearer ways of representing statement options. The
>>>> real problems with the railroad design come when there are lots of
>>>> references to other diagrams, and you end up with about 10 just for 1
>>>> statement.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a way of testing their usefulness?
>>>
>>> Personal experience? I used to find them quite useful when I was
>>> starting out with Informix.
>>>
>>
>> I guess I'm quite used to the existing statement definitions. It's an
>> elegant idea, just wondering if it scales sanely. Are the examples of
>> more complex statements?
>
> Oracle SELECT:
>
> http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B14117_01/server.101/b10759/statements_10002.htm
>
> Joe
>
Yeah, that kinda chaotic. Looks like a sadistic puzzle from the
Krypton Factor. :S
Thom
