On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 19:03, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 18:59, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Just stick with the OID. There's no reason that I can see to have
>>> "friendly" names for these tarfiles --- in most cases, the DBA will
>>> never even deal with them, no?
>
>> No, this is the output mode where the DBA chooses to get the output in
>> the form of tarfiles. So if chosen, he will definitely deal with it.
>
> Mph. How big a use-case has that got? Offhand I can't see a reason to
> use it at all, ever. If you're trying to set up a clone you want the
> files unpacked.
Yes, but the tool isn't just for setting up a clone.
If you're doing a regular base backup, that's *not* for replication,
you might want them in files.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
