Re: Analysis Function - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From David Jarvis
Subject Re: Analysis Function
Date
Msg-id AANLkTikBJ4fOqQm4A_sq68SlWnJKkjYKA2L02C4vWQwO@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Analysis Function  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Analysis Function
List pgsql-performance
Hi,

We had a little chat about this with Magnus. It's pretty surprising that there's no built-in function to do this, we should consider adding one.

I agree; you should be able to create a timestamp or a date from integer values. Others, apparently, have written code. The implementation I did was pretty rudimentary, but I was going for speed.

If you could overload to_date and to_timestamp, that would be great. For example:

to_date( year ) = year-01-01
to_date( year, month ) = year-month-01
to_date( year, month, day ) = year-month-day

to_timestamp( year, month, day, hour ) = year-month-day hour:00:00.0000 GMT
etc.

construct_timestamp(year int4, month int4, date int4, hour int4, minute int4, second int4, milliseconds int4, timezone text)

Also, "date int4" should be "day int4", to avoid confusion with the date type.

Does it makes sense to use named parameter notation for the first value (the year)? This could be potentially confusing:

to_date() - What would this return? now()? Jan 1st, 1970? 2000?

Similarly, to_timestamp() ...? Seems meaningless without at least a full date and an hour.

Dave

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Analysis Function
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Analysis Function