Hello All,
Thanks a lot for all your comments. I'll try adress each suggestion.
Jean-Yves F. Barbie:
Thanks for the link with the tutorial it's very enlightning.
I had some notions of RDB theory but this destroyed some erroneus conceptions I had;
Jean-Yves F. Barbi & Oliveiros d'Azevedo Cristina
The reason why I don't want to create separate tables to deal with this issue is because this is a provisional information. I'll explain. The table "paleosites" is in fact a Shapefile that was imported via PostGIS. The column "species" it's only the first impression gathered on field work. The real species might take years or even decades to fully determine. For example we know that from paleosite "x" we have remains of dinossauria but what group? what species? Only laboratory work will be able do determine this...
The column "species" is, therefore, intended to give a first hint. The real species- that are fully studied are on a table called "specimens" wich is linked to table "species" in a relation1:m.
Do you thing that even though this issues I'm still modeling the wrong way? If I stick to the original idea (enumerating all the species in column "species" with datatype text) maybe I could eliminate the spaces (DinossariaCrocodilia) or that's just irrelevant?
Andreas:
Yes the "paleosites" table has point geometry taken from a shapefile build in real-time GPS field survey.
Thank you so much people!
(rookiness can be an awfull thing!)
Best Regards,
André Mano
---------------------------------------------------------------
Associação Leonel Trindade
SOCIEDADE DE HISTÓRIA NATURAL
Apartado 25 2564-909 Torres Vedras Portugal
Sede e Biblioteca: rua Cavaleiros da Espora Dourada, 27A 2560 Torres Vedras
Laboratório de Paleontologia e Paleoecologia: Polígono Industrial do Alto do Ameal 2565-641 Ramalhal
http://alt-shn.blogspot.com
www.alt-shn.org
