Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry
Date
Msg-id AANLkTik2A1o0tB4-RAxMZU+Md0EY5cgU_hpJjE+ixxch@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry
Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 6:38 AM, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
> Now that the latch patch is in, when do you think you'll be able to use it
> instead of the poll loop?

Here is the updated version, which uses a latch in communication from
walsender to backend. I've not changed the others. Because walsender
already uses it in HEAD, and Heikki already proposed the patch which
replaced the poll loop between walreceiver and startup process with
a latch.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Sync Replication with transaction-controlled durability
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Sync Replication with transaction-controlled durability