Re: can we publish a aset interface? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: can we publish a aset interface?
Date
Msg-id AANLkTi=yTS3zkqVkBX_SRBg5nJNkUZX8YSp9XjN-JW06@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: can we publish a aset interface?  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: can we publish a aset interface?  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't see how you could do anything with this that you can't do with
>> the existing implementation.  It's not as if you can store pointers
>> into an mmap'd block and then count on them being valid the next time
>> you map the file...  it might not end up at the same offset.
>
> you can, but you have to do preallocation and you have to use a FIXED flag.

MAP_FIXED?  As TFM says: "Because requiring a fixed address for a
mapping is less portable, the use of this option  is  discouraged."

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: can we publish a aset interface?