On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Bryan Keller <bryanck@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am considering running a Postgres with the database hosted on a NAS via NFS. I have read a few things on the Web
sayingthis is not recommended, as it will be slow and could potentially cause data corruption.
>
> My goal is to have the database on a shared filesystem so in case of server failure, I can start up a standby
Postgresserver and point it to the same database. I would rather not use a SAN as I have heard horror stories about
managingthem. Also they are extremely expensive. A DAS would be another option, but I'm not sure if a DAS can be
connectedto two servers for server failover purposes.
>
> Currently I am considering not using a shared filesystem and instead using replication between the two servers.
>
> I am wondering what solutions have others used for my active-passive Postgres failover scenario? Is a NAS still not a
recommendedapproach? Will a DAS work? Or is replication the best approach?
DAS will absolutely work. Just be careful to fence things properly so
that you don't end up with 2 servers trying to start the data
directory at the same time. It will lead to some pretty nasty
corruption.
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
>
