2011/1/3 Joel Jacobson
<joel@gluefinance.com>2011/1/2 Jim Nasby
<jim@nasby.net> Is it actually limited to functions? ISTM this concept would be valuable for anything that's not in pg_class (in other words, anything that doesn't have user data in it).
Instead of limiting the support to functions, perhaps it would make more sense to limit it to all non-data objects?
Is there a term for the group of object types not carrying any user data?
My bad, I see you already answered both my questions.
So, it does make sense, and the term for non-data object types is therefore non-pg_class, non-class or perhaps non-relation objects?
--
Best regards,
Joel Jacobson
Glue Finance
