Re: string function - "format" function proposal - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Itagaki Takahiro
Subject Re: string function - "format" function proposal
Date
Msg-id AANLkTi=d1QwFt6FO3fA-JqhRE9PM=_+5ZQfhP1h8Y0OY@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: string function - "format" function proposal  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: string function - "format" function proposal  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> So?  You'd need to quote the values anyway, in general.  If you want
> something that will be valid SQL you'd better include the functionality
> of quote_literal() in it.
>
> I'm not sure that it's a good idea to have any type-specific special
> cases.

As I remember, the original motivation of %v formatter is
some DBMSes don't like quoted numeric literals. However,
Postgres accepts quoted numerics, and we're developing Postgres.

So, our consensus would be %v formatter should be removed
completely from the format function.

--
Itagaki Takahiro


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: string function - "format" function proposal
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: git: uh-oh