SGML on functions - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Thom Brown
Subject SGML on functions
Date
Msg-id AANLkTi=cLJcfZo_oMFFrRveiOyCVz1DcPhizqgLbJ7rJ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: SGML on functions  (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>)
Re: SGML on functions  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Re: SGML on functions  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-docs
Copied from another thread...

Something I've noticed is an inconsistency in the SGML markup around
functions listed in tables.  Sometimes the entire function signature
is considered to be the function, and other times it's just the
function name, with its parameters outside of the <function> tags.

E.g.:

<function>variance</function>(<replaceable
class="parameter">expression</replaceable>)

vs

<function>stddev_samp(<replaceable
class="parameter">expression</replaceable>)</function>

Which way is correct?

--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Example indenting
Next
From: "Erik Rijkers"
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Example indenting