Re: repository size differences - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: repository size differences
Date
Msg-id AANLkTi=aNq_eEqtMAhnZb7=XwZGxsGruBPmBm5zAnSK2@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: repository size differences  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: repository size differences  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@toroid.org> writes:
>> My new clone of git://git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql.git is 196MB,
>> whereas my old clone (last synced around the beginning of September)
>> was 285MB.
>
>> Does anyone know offhand why the sizes are so different?
>
> Magnus did
>        git gc --aggressive --prune
> during the conversion.  I imagine it's the --aggressive that does it.

It's also possible that some of the history cleanup we did might have
helped, although that's pure speculation on my part.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: repository size differences
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Any reason why the default_with_oids GUC is still there?