Re: How about synchronous notifications? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Vick Khera
Subject Re: How about synchronous notifications?
Date
Msg-id AANLkTi=Zh5aX3aES=7XNKzJNc0eDS-xrG214o7LVixgZ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_notify but no pg_listen?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh@pop.jaring.my> wrote:
> Given these issues I guess it would be easier to use a separate messaging
> server (despite that still not being that easy :) ). This would have the
> characteristic of not being DB specific, so apps wouldn't be locked in to
> postgresql. Whether this is a benefit or not depends on your POV ;).
>

The AMQP protocol seems to be the way to go for messaging, if that's
where you're heading.  If you're not stuck to any legacy, then you
should go where the world is aiming.  The only drawback is the
maturity of the tools, but that improves daily.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Francisco Reyes
Date:
Subject: Re: Kill -9 for a session process caused all the sessions to be killed
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Nested literal parsing rules?