On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Lukas Eder <lukas.eder@gmail.com> wrote:
> So what you're suggesting is that the plpgsql code is causing the issues?
> Are there any indications about how I could re-write this code? The
> important thing for me is to have the aforementioned signature of the
> plpgsql function with one UDT OUT parameter. Even if this is a bit awkward
> in general, in this case, I don't mind rewriting the plpgsql function
> content to create a workaround for this problem...
Possibly something like address := (SELECT ...) rather than SELECT ...
INTO address?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
